Could we ask people to not go to his concerts...and not buy his "music" and give all of that money to the poor???
No, don't be silly! He will funnel the money to the poor as is appropriate.
Geez, you people....
OK, I'm not down with the idea that sending our ideas to Bono will make poverty history, but he has put in a lot of his own money and time to try to make poverty history. I'd think he'd know a lot more than most of us, having been to a lot more impoverished places.
Wearing a ONE bracelet doesn't help at all, but the buck ya paid for it, maybe.
well...you know you have to have your female Steve Martins somewhere... we are wild and crazy guys/girls....
His 16 filipino maids are no doubt poor and deserving.
Well, I'm just back from seeing real poverty, and I could tell Bono exactly what the people of Yacolidabouo village in the Soubré district of Upper Sassandra, Ivory Coast, would like to have: modern village latrines. (They have decent housing and actually good roads, but housing standards don't include indoor plumbing.) So he can chip in right now.
(And if he has a couple of bob left over, they also would like a bâchée
, i.e. a sturdy diesel-fuel Peugeot 404 pick-up truck, first out of the assembly line around 1962, to go sell their Achéké (manioc couscous) to the San Pedro market, about 100 miles away. It can be second-hand. Ahoy, Bono? Get goin'!)
Just another way for people to feel like they're making "a contribution" and to get Bono more publicity. He may not see that, but that's what this is, a combo publicity stunt and way to make people feel good about themselves and, by extension, feel better about him.
Wanna bet U2 or Bono has an album/CD coming out in the next six months to a year?
Agreed. Didn't he pull the same sort of stunt once or twice before? Okay, not on Yahoo, but it was exactly the same sort of appeal.
I honestly do not think it is possible to stomp out all poverty everywhere. But if he wants to try, that's fine. I'm just not playing along.
I bet Yahoo got lots of ad revenue from those 20k+ hits, though. Maybe they'll donate it. ;-)
On the other hand, I really think that Hawkings is sincere with his request for "How do we keep humanity from dying out in the next hundred years." Of course, his goal is to make people aware that there is a non-zero chance that we will wipe out the people types on the planet in the next hundred years. (I do doubt that it is as big of a chance as he thinks it is. I think the odds of wiping out technological society are low but scary but the odds of killing all of the people? Not worth losing sleep over.
I suspect that Yahoo has solicited these questions to advertise their yahoo answers service
For the answer to his question...
Include a library of either public domain or copyleft manuals for anthing else. Most of the academics I know in the bootstrap the poor field would be happy to put their methods into the public domain if it would get them to the people who need them.
There will always be poor, some people won't or can't take help, but there need not be as many poor as there are now.
Ooh, also, work on nanotube filters or specialized crown ethers for low power desalination. (Either might work, depends on which one you get the research done on first.)
A MacArthur grant would go a long way to making the first one, though some of the IP would be difficult to get for a mere half mil.
But how does all this provide latrines to Yacolidabouo village? (see post above)
... and I'll be a bit less flippant. Most of the world actually needs hardware. Open-source is good, but moot unless you have the actual telephone lines or the satellite feed to give you broadband. Heck, unless you have bloody electricity, which requires big plants, dams, high-voltage lines, all sorts of things we take for granted. In fact, I asked about using Linux at the Ivory Coast Electricity Company (yes, the people who run that utility for the entire country), and they said what they need are Pentium 3s (4s sounded like a dream) running Windows, because they have to make everyone connect and use the same software, which they mostly have, but are not about to change. Linux may sound for the poor, but it's actually for people who have the luxury of choice and education.
By your criteria, almost any individual action is irrelevant.
Problem with that is that all actions are individual. The feminist who goes topless may not do noticable good the first time or the fith time or the hundredth time, but she and her sisters (I realize that there are guy feminists who would go topless but that has less effect) do contribute until eventually a cop says "oh screw it" and ignores it, and then it gets ignored more and more until eventually one community says "hey you know what? this didn't lead to orgys in the streets, go ahead." Single answers and protests don't fix a problem, but they do help create the mental space that will allow the problem to be fixed.
But, to what actual end? What does going topless do to truly change the well-being of women? For the inbalance in wages? To fight the abuse of women?
I am all for individual action. Individuals lobbying and fighting have caused change. But engaging in symbolic behavior that utterly lacks an action message is simply self-serving.
If you are of the school that these things are all symptomatic of a systemic bias that includes things like a nudity taboo, then you can argue that attacking any point of the problem helps bring the rest of them closer to solution. The men are allowed to go topless but when women do it it is obscene could be traced to an ethos of women as property which could then be traced to imballance in wages, right to controll your own body issues, the wink and nod at the abuse of women, and other such problems. I'm not sure that that is right, but I'm not willing to say it is wrong, and pushing for equality of mores won't hurt the other causes.
I had actually been thinking that immediately, but decided not to
fight go all cynic on two fronts.
*visualises any number of feminists going topless on Madison Avenue, and the men in the crowd thinking all their Christmases had come at once*
*ponders your point*
*laughs at your icon*
*returns to point* -- I think you're right, that stunts like this are just silly. Now, if a serious celebrity like Angelina were to take up this cause...
even as much as i worship U2 and Bono, this crap on Yahoo! was too much for me. i didn't reply, for all of the same reasons you listed. :(
i did check out www.one.com and see what that was about. i hope they put their money where their "mouth" is.
"as the feminist going topless...We sure showed them! they giggle in glee. Showed who what?"
It's clear what the feminist showed onlookers... ;-)
Reminds me of Captain Chaos (aka Butters from South Park) switching two peoples' soup bowls and calling it a victory for chaos, with surprise when it wasn't on the news that night.
How would you have felt about a post from Bono asking "What are you doing to make poverty history?" rather than his "What should I do to mph?"
I didn't see it as "what should Bono do personally" but rather as "quick, in three paragraphs tell the world how to solve this millenia-old problem!" Which is just silly.
Therefore, it would have been better if it had asked what the individual was doing, but it would not have sold - that would be a guilt trip, instead of "empowering."
2006-07-08 02:53 pm (UTC)
Once again you are right on the "money," so to speak. If he wants to do something, he can get all those celebrities who have gotten rich from us, and donate half their assets to some foundations that is ALREADY helping to alleviate poverty in this country and others.
2006-07-08 02:55 pm (UTC)
bono blather PS
when i made foundations plural, i forgot to change the verb. please don't judge my comment on that error
2006-07-08 03:18 pm (UTC)
Re: bono blather PS
No worries - I make all kinds of typos in comments!
But what else are they going to do? Americans don't actually want to be anywhere near the poor, that would be dirty and bothersome. But if they can tell a celebrity that they think its a great idea to do this and that for them then they have helped them, right? I mean those famous people know so much better than lowly old me how to make the poor unpoor, right?