?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Bite me, spank me, but make me come - The Fucking Bluebird of Goddamn Happiness [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Zoethe

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Bite me, spank me, but make me come [Mar. 3rd, 2009|09:46 am]
Zoethe
[Current Mood |aggravatednot at all horny]

Maybe, at heart, I'm too much of a guy.

Maybe I lack estrogen.

But there is nothing more depressing than the stuff that's passed off as "women's erotica."

I'll be honest: I do not read erotic short stories for the personal insight and emotional depth. I read them to enhance...performing an act of self-gratification, shall we say.

This is not a time when I'm looking for emotional catharsis, and I sure as HELL don't want to get depressed.

And yet, the books of women's erotica that I have tend to sort of follow a theme: "I was abused, filled with self-hatred, dragged over broken glass by a pack of fire-eyed hellhounds, and then had an orgasm." If you're lucky, the orgasm part is a form of rescue; as often as not, it's simply two such train wrecks colliding for a night of mutual loathing. Or it ends with angry vengeance.

Emotional baggage is not a turn on. I don't want my evening to consist of a moment of release followed by the impulse to slit my wrists.

Sex is supposed to be fun, especially in erotica. I don't want to whack it to gritty realism.

I hate to say it, Women's Erotica, but Penthouse Letters have you completely beat: "I met a hot chick/hot guy/hot couple...." "My husband and I always fantasized about doing it in public/a threesome/swap...." Followed by "and then we all had awesome sex and a lot of fun!" That's what I'm looking for when I've got a little itch, not some soul-crushing tale of power dynamics, daddy issues, or relived trauma.

I want to like you, Women's Erotica. But I don't have intimate relationships with people who carry as much baggage as you do. I'm sorry.

It's not you, it's me.
LinkReply

Comments:
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[User Picture]From: pretendpeterpan
2009-03-03 03:09 pm (UTC)
Ugh, I am with you. I actually find it really obnoxious when lame, toned down stuff is dubbed "Women's Erotica." Because, you know, women like emotions more than men do and they don't actually like sex as much.

If you're looking for some badass female-centric erotica, try Alison Tyler's Erotic Alphabet series. It's really fun and each book centers on a different theme (B is for bondage, H is for hardscore, F is for fetish, etc.)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: e_scapism101
2009-03-03 03:09 pm (UTC)
I agree. When it's me-time, I'll take the Penthouse Letters, thanks. I'm not looking for an emotional investement when I've got half an hour to myself and a vibrator with fresh batteries.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: regyt
2009-03-03 03:11 pm (UTC)
Internet porn for me all the way, usually various pervy story archives mostly filled with crap but a few gems.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: erisreg
2009-03-03 03:12 pm (UTC)

It's not you

yes it is,..;)
(Reply) (Thread)
From: sharpchick
2009-03-03 03:32 pm (UTC)
May I suggest the erotica on Literotica?

I've been writing for them for several years. Even though we are all technically amateurs, there is some really good stuff there. And there is a really neat list of "categories" - something for everyone.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 04:16 pm (UTC)
I will definitely take a look. Thanks.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: funwithrage
2009-03-03 03:37 pm (UTC)
Can I just say: word.

Sadly, the Penthouse Letters/alt.sex.stories stuff all seems to veer a little too strongly toward the "fuckstick"/"meatrod"/"gash" vocabulary, and that stuff turns me off for the opposite reason: it's just too damn silly, like the anatomical pictures eighth-grade boys draw in social studies texts.

This is why I read PWP fic, romance novels, and Victorian porn.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kibbles
2009-03-03 03:39 pm (UTC)
I agree. those letters/that kind of crap doesn't do it for me, either. It's a big yawnfest.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: fmh
2009-03-03 03:37 pm (UTC)

Guys Two Cents

I think writers of womens erotica work under the notion that sexuality for women is more cerebral then it is for men, so they sort of go all purple prose on the usual sheet twisting yelling for god(s)(ess) fuckfest that is sometimes all anybody wants when they're reading with one hand. I can't explain the "let's make the character a psychological train wreck" angle though, I don't get why anyone would think that's hot.

Edited at 2009-03-03 03:38 pm (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 04:11 pm (UTC)

Re: Guys Two Cents

I don't mind vivid prose, provided it's people who are actually having a good time. Though it sometimes gets in the way, definitely.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: custardfairy
2009-03-03 03:42 pm (UTC)
Thank. You.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 04:12 pm (UTC)
I need to steal your icon.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 04:31 pm (UTC)
If I'm reading a novel about someone who has emotional issues, fine.

If I'm reading something that is intended to be a turn on? Yeah, angst free, please.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: que_sara_sara
2009-03-03 04:29 pm (UTC)
Maybe I should start writing those "Anonymous" books... they'd at least read a lot more like Penthouse Letters.... Hrmm.....
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 04:32 pm (UTC)
A fine idea!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]From: polymorphism
2009-03-03 04:36 pm (UTC)
Try Cliterati? I haven't been reading there lately so can't speak to recent quality, but I used to quite like it.

I have definitely skimmed talky erotica - there's a timetable involved, man! - but I can't think of any I've read any that's like what you describe. Somehow I don't think I'll go looking for it. Now I'm curious, though: would you quantify Anais Nin (I'm thinking Delta of Venus here) thusly? That's the only thing I've read that does sound like this.

I certainly have read erotica I didn't like, but it's usually either in the forms of "so not my kink," "my disbelief can only suspend so high" or "eats, shoots a load and leaves" - tortured sentence structure and grammar are NOT the beautiful kind of agony.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 10:46 pm (UTC)
No, Nin is dark but still sexy. It's a more modern kind of short story writing that I'm talking about, generally in short story collections. Even the Anne Rice "Beauty" series, which is a level of S/M that makes me wince, doesn't have the kind of angsty, here's-sex-that's-ugly-not-sexy stuff I'm talking about.

And your last sentence made me giggle wildly and in total agreement.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]From: sageautumn
2009-03-03 04:57 pm (UTC)
I'm with you... "women's erotica" tends to leave me annoyed. The bit I've dabbled in is either as you described... or does the annoying .

I want a scene. I don't even care if there's a entrance into the scene. (truly... I've written snippets for lovers where it began "... turning her over and etc "

I want harsher words. Lips of the nether region is... annoying unless done VERY correctly (as in period--er,time--related) like in The Pearl. Otherwise, I'd much rather hear more direct terms.

And I, too, have found my preferance leans to "Penthouse Letters". Quick, easy, done.

I do also like Literotica. And also asstr--though some of the stuff on there can go WAY WAY ick for me, so it's hard to balance.

On the other hand, I've also read some stuff that I'd've thought would make me go ick... but was really, really good. (The Wulf Archives, which I can't find anymore, is a great example of this.) (I figure someone, somewhere has them.. and with your readers.. it could well be one of them.)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zodarzone
2009-03-03 05:25 pm (UTC)
Next time I see you I'm going to have to throw some Small Favors your way. Best porn comic ever because it's fun, 100% fun, everyone is having lots and lots and LOTS of fun. And amazing cute.
http://www.colleencoover.net/?page_id=101
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 10:54 pm (UTC)
Ooo, definitely! I think I would enjoy that quite a lot. Thanks, hon!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: cinema_babe
2009-03-03 06:41 pm (UTC)
I'm always glad when I see another woman write this. I sometimes joke about having the heart of a 15 year old boy at times but,for years I used to think I was a deviant and freak for preferring more traditional porn to what passes as "Erotica for Women". (Of course later I realized that I'm a deviant and freak for a host of other reasons.)

I think that part of it has to do with not only sexist assumptions that girls want love while boys want sex, but I've also seen some (unconscience, I hope) reinforcement quaint notion that women are somehow asexual or that their their sexuality is truly only released when they find "Twoo Luv" and that woman who are find sexual gratification otherwise are somehow damaged creatures.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 10:59 pm (UTC)
Or that women who want sex just because it's fun are angry or aggressive or damaged. OR, that's it's not really pleasant and enjoyable after all.

If it was just mushy, I could roll my eyes and go on. But it's the "sexual woman must be victim or evil predator" or "sex is really bad, sad, lonely and isolating" aspects that exasperate me..
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kellirose1313
2009-03-03 07:12 pm (UTC)
I fully agree with those who said Literotica.

I tend to also write my own stories. I admit they're cheesy as hell but I like putting my own fantasies down to revisit later. Plus I always know it's exactly what I'm looking for.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoethe
2009-03-03 10:59 pm (UTC)
I used to have time for that....
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>