Whenever my son (who is 10) asks me something like what I would want him to be when he grows up, my only answer is 'happy'. Who he loves, what he does for a living - all I want is for those things to make him happy. Not for it to fit into some idea of normalcy I have in my mind.
Fabulous. *waves the sarcasm flag furiously*
I can't even get angry anymore, I'm just so unsurprised. Disgusted, yes. I can work that up.
Sweet gods and little fishes.
Maybe they can find a way to genetically remove girl fetus's lower ribs so they can be snugged into corsets and raised in the Victorian style.
I've read a few articles about the problem of proving that sexual orientation is in fact genetic. On one hand, yup, you are who you are. Born that way, no options. Excellent, now all those totally wacked out relgious fix-it conversion centers can go away.
On the hand, future moms and dads can now get their fetuses screened for this particular genetic "deformity." And just like that, problem solved.
Of course, there is always the theory that in the end nature always gets its way....
It's terrifying to imagine. And thank god for nature. It will kick our asses.
That is completely beside the point, of course.
I was supposed to be the girl of the family, according to the various family friends anyway. My parents already had my two brothers who arrived six and five years before I came along. Apparently when these people found out my mom was pregnant, they said, "Oh, think pink!" However, they had another boy and both my parents were happy because all they wanted from their babies was that they were healthy. In fact, my mom was in a ward with other mothers recovering from giving birth and there was this one particular woman who was so pissed off that she had had another baby boy instead of a girl that she said she didn't even want to see him. A doctor came in to try to reason with the stupid bitch. He said something like, "Now, look: You should be grateful that your baby is healthy and alive."
These people Do Not Get It. Oh, sure, they pay lip service to diversity--even support & pass lots of legislation on it--but only in cases where they have begrudgingly accepted that the "problem" (the existence of N----rs, Kikes, Wops, Chinks, Japs, Spics, Micks, Krauts, whatevers) can't be "fixed."
But sexuality--ah, _that_ problem _can_ be fixed (they think; I'm not so sure, even with genetic and chemical manipulation). My sadly cynical view of the situation is that any form of diversity that _can_ be eliminated, some part of the population will want to eliminate. We can only hope that that faction is small enough to be overpowered politically by The Rest of Us.
I guess it's part of the progress: bring sexuality into the light, and then deal with accepting it. But it's scary to think that people would risk the future health of their daughters for such a dubious benefit. Who knows what kinds of cancers and things we will see in 30 or 40 years from this kind of mutagenic treatment?
Dan Savage finds the most interesting of articles and news. I'm glad for him being around, especially after I read the bit about Cornell and a doctor actually surgically altering little girls' clitoris to make them look "appropriate sized". *shudders*
What is wrong with this world when we can't accept differences?
I find the theory that girly girls = straight girls completely laughable. It's fake pseudoscience. And sad.
Did I miss something?
to make little girls interested in playing with baby dolls and growing up to want to be good mommies.
And to decrease the number of lesbian and bisexual women.
So, er, where's the evidence that wanting to be a mother or to play with dolls stops you being a lesbian or bisexual? Or somehow "converts you in the womb"? ... obviously I've not read the article, because my time is precious, certainly too precious to be reading obvious junk "science" like that.
You aren't missing something, but they certainly are. Their research connects the two. Which is, of course, insane.
What is truly scary is that Dr. Maria New has been doing this for 20 years.
I mean didn't these morons learn ANYthing from what happened with David Reimer?
Of course not. Children are blank slates, and if we can mutate them before birth, even better!
I saw this yesterday and I was saddened but not surprised.
I see a few issues here:
(a)There is a condition called congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CHA), this isn't something invented for this study. However there *are* other treatments for this condition. While the current treatment involves
(b)I am greatly disturbed by Doctor's New and Meyer-Bahlburg's reasoning behind using this conducting the experiment. Gender normative (read: stereotypical) behavior should not be a reason (stated or implied) for dosing women and their fetuses up with some drug. Their comments verge on eugenics.
(c)So much of their feeble argument seems based on sparing parents any kind of distress. God forbid your child not play with dolls like all the rest of the little girls. God forbid she's not a deferential delicate flower letter a big strong man do all the heavy lifting for her. God forbid she be bisexual or gay. I question whether parental discomfort is an adequate reason to do this study.
(d)They are conducting this study without the oversight of an IRB? WTF??!! I know that some people find IRBs to be a PIA but they do serve a purpose one of which is to ensure that study protocols carry a reasonable amount of risk for the participants. Who is protecting the participants and who is their voice?
(e)Finally, this goes back to the whole idea of gender as a binary? male/female, check one and only one. I tend to believe that gender is more of an inverted bell curve. While most people fall towards the ends, there are people all along the spectrum. Are those people a problem to be solved?
Yup this has homophobic, suspect science written all over it.
It makes me sad and scared.
I just finished reading The Windup Girl, about this very issue, and a lot of related ones. If you even have the time, I think you'd find it interesting (by Paolo Bacigalupi).
I have been meaning to read it.
2010-07-01 06:41 pm (UTC)
"Get beyond the absolute outrage of how they can dare to make a judgment call that "girly" women are somehow superior as mothers - and apparently more desirable as people. Get beyond the fury at the idea that eliminating lesbians is somehow a societal good. Get beyond the dizzying notion that doctors would propose - and mothers would allow - treatment of undeveloped fetuses with incredibly risky and poorly tested hormones. Take a few moments to get past seeing red for all these things."
Nope, sorry. Tried and I can't.
I don't think we'll ever get to Gattaca because we will collapse ourselves as a species long before that. We lack the knowledge and imagination to make it work.
I can't get past wondering how much information the people involved were actually given about the risks involved. Because according to an update, there was an article done on the risks, and it's better to risk birth defects or a dead baby than a gay one? If that's how these homophobic fuckers feel, they don't deserve the blessing of being able to have a baby. *enraged*
I feel sorry for the daughters/victims. Undoubtedly in 20 years they will be diagnosed with horrible cancers or other diseases. It's so foolish.